.
Feedback

This Shouldn't be the Focus of Your Workouts

Mental Pitfalls To Avoid In Your Training

As someone who has trained thousands of people and has witnessed many people completely change their lives I have to say I love what I do. I get to coach people through a journey of total positive self improvement. One of the biggest things I try to instill in my clients is having the right intention.

A lot of gimmicky fitness products and programs will try to lure the end user in by using buzzwords like "burn up to 1,000 calories per workout" or "only 30 minutes 3X per week" and the beloved " really targets those trouble spots". Here is the deal, having the right mindset when undergoing a training program is just as if not more important than the training itself. 

Below I have listed some short-sided pitfalls that can cause added and unnecessary stress to your program. Avoid these pitfalls and your program shall flourish as a result. Go time....

1. How many calories you burn in the workout

This is the tried and true way to convince someone that your program is "the bomb". Tell someone eager for fast results that they will burn a cagillion (oh it's a number) calories in your 40 minute workout and you have suddenly opened the Pandora's box to the ultimate wonderland. Here is the unfortunate thing... Calorie expenditure during a workout is not a good indicator of how successful the program is.

Instead the focus should be on the achieved intensity of the session and how adequately you pushed yourself. What I mean by this was did you work movement patterns that challenged your body adequately, required immense focus and precision, and pushed you out of your comfort zone? If yes then the session was probably of high quality even it it only burned 500cals. As coach Martin Rooney would say there is a big difference between training and getting really tired. Improving the body's ability to perform demanding strength based work will always be the key to success in a workout program.    

2. How fast you can finish the workout

The fitness industry is a funny animal. While there are some sub cultures in fitness that are geared around banging out workouts in the fastest amount of time humanly possible there are others that promote 5-6 days of week in the gym at an hour a pop and occasionally multiple sessions a day.

The answer really is, the program and the focus of the work (your goals) should dictate the duration of time you spend training. For example, if you are doing a program rooted in building immense strength your sessions might be longer due to the need for longer rest intervals and higher demand of work. Conversely, if you are doing workouts that are composed of high intensity sprint intervals your training time might be significantly reduced as the training effect will be realized much more quickly.

The program and the training session should dictate the duration of training and not vice versa. Focus on achieving a high quality of work and completing the days objectives safely.

3. How sore you are the next day

This is something that is still touted by fitness seekers everywhere as a signifier of a great session. People will say, "man I am so sore today, that workout was killer!" and while soreness gives you the mental sense that you accomplished an effective workout it can be a false indicator. Let me explain..

Lets say for example I did a workout where all I did was an hour of bicep curls and triceps press downs. Now undoubtedly my arms will be pretty sore the next day. However, spending all that time beating the you know what out of the tiny muscles in my arms does not qualify as a quality workout. Whereas I may choose to do some kettlebell swings followed by an intense sprint up a huge flight of stairs for 4-5 sets and may not be debilitating sore the next day but the metabolic impact of that workout will be much more significant than "arm day".

4. What muscles you are working

This correlates to the previous point somewhat but I would like to explore this concept as well. Muscle isolation exercises tend to be a misdirected focus in a program that is looking to gain a big bang for your buck.

The majority of strength drills I do with my clients include deadlifts, squats, swings, snatches, cleans, overhead presses, rows, and plank variations. The movements recruit a ton of muscles at one time and train the body as a unit not as a segmented system of parts. Remember, exercises that recruit multiple muscles at the same time train the body to function better and provide a better metabolic boost than isolation exercises therefor dynamic movements should be your focus not targeted muscle drills.

Wrap Up:

At the end of the day the best programs are those that put a focus on gaining a high level of strength, providing an outlet for high intensity cardiorespitory conditioning, and include dynamic & technical lifting patterns that improve the body's athletic potential. This composes a much more well rounded program and puts the focus on long term development vs short term satisfaction. Keep your focus on the big picture and keep your results coming in a big way!   

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Clemente Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sicmarc May 9, 2013 at 07:35 pm
Bring back the bowling alley!
Tom Barnes May 9, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Linda, The hypocrisy of opposing subsidies for Spizzirri and the Miramar after you and your companyRead More had the city spend a million on your LAB project is almost laughable. You also accepted an indirect subsidy from the city in the form of parking concessions for the Casino. The irony of big business opposing subsidies for others while accepting them for themselves is long remembered by San Clemente residents. Some consistency would be refreshing.
Lindsey Hanson May 8, 2013 at 03:31 pm
Linda you were 100% okay with such subsidies when they were offered to you. Heck you sued the cityRead More after the residents shut your project down before you could reap the benefits of the millions in subsidies you were set to gain. If you're banking on the residents of San Clemente forgetting your personal and direct involvement in the very same practices you can grantee I'll help remind them. See the thing is I agree with you about giving handouts to folks like YOU and Marc Spizzirri. It's DEAD wrong. The very reason I fought so hard to shut down YOUR PDN. So now that we all remember your involvement in the very same kinds of activities you are protesting we can clearly see why you are upset. You've done such a nice job with the Casino. It IS unfair if they grant subsidies to Mr. Spizzirri after denying you. That in itself is enough reason to be upset and a legitimate reason to protest. But, you cannot deny it is part of your beef with the situation.
CC May 1, 2013 at 11:46 am
Frank Mitchell has the correct FACTUAL not emotional response. Ann D to call yourself a "lovingRead More citizen" and name someone a bigot in the same paragraph shows your true colors. If you truly feel that having non-english speaking children is not a burden on our school system then I suggest you go volunteer in a local elementary school on a weekly basis as I have done then you would be a true "loving citizen"
Ann D May 1, 2013 at 01:58 am
It's just a difference of opinion on where tax dollars should be spent. As a taxpayer I feel myRead More hefty taxes are better served educating children that will grow up into productive adults--"alien" or not they are a hard working people group. We spend far too much on wars and such...spend money on investing in people and guess what I am also fine with the free lunch program. :-) My tax dollars, my vote, money where my heart is. It's fine your heart or passion lies where it does...that's what makes America so great and makes so many people want to come here. Guess what? Your relatives came here too so "alien" status is a little more close to home than you think perhaps.
tiny May 1, 2013 at 12:41 am
Ann D, Williams alien ship may be a u-boat with pariscope up.
lily May 6, 2013 at 06:51 pm
Vikki yes I agree, more bully breed owners should be out there advocating for the breed. ThereRead More are wonderful groups that do just that, but we need more.
PK May 6, 2013 at 05:22 pm
Bottom line is that any animal that is abused or trained to be aggressive by low life owners will beRead More a threat to people and other animals. You cannot blame the animal for how it is treated. It is the owners who brutalize breeds to become this way. I have known some pit bull's that have been treated well, with love and care, and they are the nicest most loyal animals out there. Owners and breeders are responsible.
Vikki Foley Boyd May 6, 2013 at 02:10 pm
Lilly, I think we are saying the same thing. You can't make broad statements about any group.Read More I would never use the word "all" but you can identify 'trends' and draw a correlation between criminals and their choices, i.e., 'generally', drug dealers will own guns. People are ignoramuses if they said to your face that you must be a drug dealer because of your breed. The rescue people think I'm a pretentious highbrow because I will only own a purebred AKC dog. I could care less. They are entitled to their opinion. It's my money and my training time that I put into my dog. Like I said , pitbull owners need to get out there in the dog sports world like Jen. Once the public see's more of these dogs doing amazing work with their responsible handlers, this will show the breed in a more positive light. Instead they sit on chat rooms and complain how they are discriminated against. AKC now allows mixed breed and non-AKC registered dogs to compete in obedience. This is not an expensive sport and can be very rewarding for both dog and handler.
Joanna Clark April 28, 2013 at 01:07 pm
Worth reading . . . http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/04/26-1 Published on Friday, AprilRead More 26, 2013 by Common Dreams San Onofre Whistleblower Cites "Potentially Catastrophic" Design Flaw Inside source tells local news channel that cracked generator pipes at nuclear power plant could cause a full or partial meltdown - Lauren McCauley, staff writer
San Juan April 11, 2013 at 03:20 pm
No, say it aint so, the NUKE causing damage to our enviornment, no, please say it aint so...IT'SRead More SO!!!!!!!!!! SHUT THAT MONSTER DOWN RIGHT NOW AND STOP ALL THE BALONEY. WAKE UP CITIZENS NOW'S THE TIME TO SPEAK UP, IF YOU THINK THE FISH POPULATION IS MESSED UP, JUST WAIT TIL A MAJOR INCIDENT HAPPENS, THEN YOU CAN KISS THIS AREA GOOD BYE, JUST LIKE THE LITTLE FISHIES.!