.

OPINION: Council Vote on Nuclear Issue Was a Victory for Anti-Nuke Crowd

Tuesday was a victory of sorts in the effort to shut down San Onofre before the big one hits.

Tuesday night, October 18th, was at least a partial victory for us in this final meeting the city held in a series of three on lessons learned from Fukushima.

It was clear from the beginning that the council would not go as far as calling for an immediate shutdown, but we felt it was worth the effort to try to persuade them while also informing a public largely blind to the true dangers of San Onofre.

In our awareness campaign alone, we distributed over 6,000 fliers revealing reliable and verified facts that should concern those of us living within 50 miles of the second most dangerous nuclear power plant of all 104 in the USA.

In the last four months we must have attended at least six televised city council meetings with passionate and persuasive requests to take action. Often we were criticized for being alarmists and extremists, but so were four of the top independent nuclear experts that we brought into the talks. It seemed no one wanted to hear the truth from us or anyone else.

But then the staff recommendation for council action came out shortly before the meeting and had an alternative proposal similar to ours, citing many of the same issues, but falling short of demanding an immediate shutdown until after the lessons from Fukushima had been applied.

We were glad to see one statement in particular calling for a moratorium on re-licensing until a permanent storage solution for the highly radioactive waste was available. That shuts down any likelihood of Southern California Edison operating the plant past 2022, but of course, we don't think we have that kind of time to wait for the next major quake in our area.

Coincidentally, Thursday was the practice run for the "Great Shake Out" statewide earthquake drill which simulates a 7.8 on the San Andreas Fault, although seismologists know it could easily be an 8.0 or greater, (twice the power of a 7.8).

The death and destruction they anticipate is staggering, and even at that, emergency quake plans have no consideration at all for nuclear fallout in case there are problems at San Onofre.

Perhaps it is simply incalculable. How foolish can our planning efforts be if we anticipate a huge earthquake with such certainty in "The Great Shake Out," but act as if the big quake is highly unlikely when discussing vulnerabilities of a nuclear power plant only built to withstand a 7.0 quake?

Anyway, after a long night of deliberations, we were pleased to get a 5-0 Vote for the staff recommendation which was actually strengthened by additional language stressing urgency and a call to action for every city in Orange County to support this effort. That was bigger than anything we ever expected.

We are very grateful to the leaders of our city for showing the courage and wisdom of holding these meetings for us and for reaching beyond their comfort zones to do what is right. It is certainly quite an accomplishment in a company town like ours when Edison claims to contribute over $200 million to our local economy per year.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Gene Stone October 21, 2011 at 08:45 PM
We knew there was only a 1% chance at best that they would adopt our resolution. But we should all recall the goal was not to get them to adopt the resolution it was to bring the matter before the citizens of our town and surrounding areas so they might begin their awakening of the critical issues before us all. Which we have done and thanks to Mayor Lori a letter of information of what has been adopted will be sent to every city in Orange county, and they will ask them for their support. This surpasses personally my wildest dreams of success in this effort. I hope everyone understands that we have accomplished our 1st goal to bring this to the forefront of the city Council & people of San Clemente. Now the question is what are we going to do with this attention? Now is the time for action and more hard facts, now is the time to go to the county supervisors, to the state, our work has just begun. It has only taken us four months or so to take a topic that was dead and bring it to life again, although be at a small light.
Darin R. McClure October 22, 2011 at 01:37 AM
Keep on shaken the tree.
JT October 22, 2011 at 04:13 PM
I am pleased to hear the results. We now have the momentum to pick up even more speed , and channel our efforts to the next level. As for those who considered us as "alarmists, and extremists", well, let's just call you "ignorant, un-willing, and uneducated". I now would hope that what you have learned from this, will educate you in a way that makes you part of the solution, and no longer part of the problem. We are on the right track here, and I wish to thank Gene, and Darin, along with all of those involved for all of your hard work, past, present, and above all.....future Believe!
Debbie Ferrari, Realty Broker October 22, 2011 at 08:42 PM
We need more Gary Headricks in our town. Thanks, Gary, for championing those causes that we all need to support. Thank you for letting us know now, because AFTER the 8.0 quake will be way too late.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something