UPDATE: Attorney Blasts DA Report on Loggins Shooting

Family lawyer says the report used a "one-sided analysis" of facts to absolve the deputy who shot and killed Marine Sgt. Manny Loggins in February. He also castigates investigators, saying they coerced incriminating statements from Loggin

The district attorney report that absolved a sheriff’s deputy in the fatal shooting of Marine Sgt. Manny Loggins was largely based on inaccurate, coerced statements from his traumatized 9-year-old daughter, the family’s lawyer said Wednesday.

“The mind of a 9-year-old, surrounded by seasoned interrogating officers -- you can make [her] say anything you want,” said attorney Brian T. Dunn, who is representing the family in its civil lawsuit over the death.

In a Wednesday phone interview, Dunn challenged various aspects of the D.A.’s report, including suggestions that Loggins was behaving irrationally because of a religious fast from food and liquids.

Dunn said the fast ended weeks before the Feb. 7 shooting, and didn’t involve liquids, simply a modification in diet. He said the coroner’s report showed no evidence of dehydration.

“You really can’t make these kind of logical deductions with what they’ve got,” Dunn said. “They basically concluded out there that this man had to die based on no evidence. You can’t just shoot and kill someone just because they disobey you.”

Dunn said the D.A.'s decision not to prosecute was based on "a one-sided analysis" that relied on Deputy Darren Sandberg's version of events and ignored "the abysmal tactical decisions underlying the deputy's tragic errors."

According to the D.A., on the morning of Feb. 7, Loggins crashed his GMC Yukon through a gate on the San Clemente High School campus, drawing the attention of Sandberg, who sat in his cruiser filling out paperwork in the parking lot.

After Sandberg pulled up behind the vehicle with lights flashing, Loggins reportedly ignored the deputy, stalking off toward the football field and leaving his two young daughters in the back seat, according to the report. A few moments later, after backup units arrived on the scene, Loggins returned from the field. When he ignored Sandberg's commands not to get back in the car and turned the ignition, Sandberg fired three shots through the window.

According to the D.A.'s report, one of Loggins' daughters later told investigators: "I was afraid, and I think the officer was too, so that's why he shot him, so we wouldn't get hurt."

Dunn said that and other comments from the 9- and 14-year-old girls were taken out of context.

He said the girls were locked up in separate interview rooms for 13 hours while deputies relentlessly interrogated them, refusing to tell them their father was dead (he died almost immediately after the shooting).

“I talked to the girls, and what they said was that [investigators] kept asking them the same questions over and over again,” Dunn said. “They felt if they didn’t tell them what they wanted to hear, they would never let them go."

Dunn said investigators also asked leading questions. “I'll give you an example: ‘Was your father angry?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘Your father wasn’t acting normal?’ ‘No.’ ‘Would you say your father was berserk?’ ”

Tapes of the interviews have not been released, but Dunn said he would try to obtain them.

Dunn said it would have been easier on the family if the D.A.’s office had simply issued a brief statement saying it didn’t have enough evidence to prosecute.

“To fill the record with all these statements from the kids just adds insult to injury,” Dunn said.

Earlier this year, the family sued the county for damages. A jury trial is scheduled for Sept. 10 in U.S. Central District Court in Santa Ana.

Dunn said it was too early to say whether the Loggins family would consider accepting a settlement from the county if one were offered.

“At this point, the family is more concerned that this doesn’t happen to anyone else,” Dunn said. “[In the D.A.’s report,] there’s no recognition of wrongdoing, and if there’s no recognition of wrongdoing, it’s just going to happen over and over again.”

Rob October 03, 2012 at 05:13 PM
I'm so sick of these stories about this guy. He deserved what he got, next time listen to the officers orders. Now let's work on getting his wife out of this state so all the whining stops.
Chris McLaughlin October 03, 2012 at 06:02 PM
It looks like the family's attorney has given up on a criminal charge against Sandberg, but maybe that's just because his main focus is the civil action they're pursuing. I think in Civil Court they'll have much greater latitude to bring in evidence and call witnesses to testify. I hope they get to the bottom of whether Sandberg was familiar with the Loggins Family routine of coming to the San Clemente HS athletic fields at that hour, and if any 'prior relationship' existed between Sandberg and Loggins, or other deputies and Loggins, maybe ones who had been doing the night shift longer than Sandberg. There's curiously no mention of any of that in the DA's letter to Sheriff. I'm sure they would claim that it's simply not germane to a potential criminal case against Sandberg, but if it comes out that Sandberg or the SC Police night shift was familiar with the Loggins family routine there and still are claiming that they are totally shocked at what happened at the outset (especially if it's true the gate was normally not locked), I'm going to cry foul.
Adam Townsend October 03, 2012 at 06:50 PM
I have an update to this article coming with further and more specific comments from Mr. Dunn in which he disputes several specific findings in the DA's report. Hang tight.
Hercules1944 October 03, 2012 at 10:11 PM
I read the DA report. I could have quoted it almost verbatim before even reading it that Deputy Sandberg walked on water and did everything by the book. Not. The whole thing is SOP of the " Good Old Boys In Blue Club" protecting one of their own. DA's are part of that club folks. Give me a 14 and 9 year old chold, held without cause and no parent/other family member or lawyer present during questioning, I think after 12-13 hours I could get them to swear on a stack of bibles that I was indeed Santa Claus or at least the Easter Bunny. I don't think Deputy Sandberg willingly, knowingly and wantonly set about to murder Loggins, but Deputy Sanberg was ill trained to be an LEO in any type of serious circumstance, period and end of discussion. He had backup, this we know, so where the hell was Loggins going to drive off to? Why was Loggins even allowed back into the SUV for starters? Just block the damn door to prevent vehicle entry would be a good start. The SUV should have been blocked front and rear from going anyplace anyhow. To be blunt, tactically evryone of the on scene LEO's performed like a bunch of "Keystone Kops." Way to go OC, one dead Marine because of incompetents, and the buffoons are still out there to protect you? Glad I don't live in OC. LEO culpability, whether intentional or not, means nothing in OC. Get rid of the deadwoods by any means possible or you will have more innocent citizens paying the ultimate price for the buffoonary, trust me.
peoplewatcher October 03, 2012 at 11:47 PM
Rob, You are barely human. What is missing with your thought process and ability to empathize?
Chris McLaughlin October 04, 2012 at 12:35 AM
Next time? What next time? Sandberg killed Loggins. There is no next time for Loggins. There shouldn't be a next time for Sandberg, either. He needs to be permanently disarmed.
jeff s October 04, 2012 at 01:48 PM
Murdered him plain and simple. Who the hell fires 3 shots at an unarmed man with children in the car. Bullets bounce and ricochet, the swine is lucky the girls did not get hit/killed. ..but of course they would clear him for this too... Disgusting law enforcement we have here... Shameful..
SanClemTraveler October 04, 2012 at 05:44 PM
The saddest (and most egregious) is the fact these two daughters were held for questioning for 13 hours with no-one to represent them. Don't minors have SOME rights? THey did nothing wrong & there was certainly sufficient time without witnesses (or recordings?) to impact their testimony.....another crime.....
PhilM October 04, 2012 at 07:08 PM
A pertinent question: Had this been a legally-carrying Citizen, would he have been justified in using deadly force under similar circumstances? The Police Forces only have the authority to use force as granted by the Public they serve, and are supposedly trained in the escalation of that force under varying scenarios. What was Deputy Sandberg's training that led him to the split-second decision to bypass his baton and resort to his gun? He knew that other officers were in the immediate area and would advance to any fight with Sgt. Loggins before he had entered his SUV. If, as Sandberg states, he was concerned for the 'safety' of the Loggins children then why did he leave them inside the SUV without either moving them himself or calling over another deputy to handle that? Sandberg stated he didn't have a Tazer. Is that a normal item of a deputy's escalation of force carry items? Was he more concerned with getting hurt than by 'saving' the Loggins children? ... [ continued ]
PhilM October 04, 2012 at 07:09 PM
... [ continued ] Why were the Loggins children held for thirteen hours by the police, when they should have called Childrens Services and turned them over? The pitiful excuse that "they weren't 'suspects' and weren't under arrest" is a lie. They weren't allowed to call any relative, nor allowed to leave - that long of a 'detention' is an arrest. So far all of the 'investigations' into this homicide have been by entities that have a vested interest in maintaining their positions. Any such investigation needs to be outsourced to a non-related agency; a non-bordering County, the State units of police or prosecutors, or a federal agency. I pray for justice for the Loggins family.
Paul Verity October 05, 2012 at 04:36 PM
In the interest of truth, justice, and transparency, any tapes from interviews or surveillance recordings from the OCSD should be released immediately since the investigation has reached its conclusion.
Bret F. October 05, 2012 at 05:31 PM
This is why the F.B.I. should investigate every office involved shooting, instead of the local PD. So an objective and impartial investigation is carried out. If the F.B.I. can show up for every bank robbery, they should be required for independent investigation of every officer involved shooting or person killed in custody.
David Zeller October 29, 2012 at 10:02 PM
Rob, I only hope you and your loved ones never get "what they deserve"...you are one sad human being
David Zeller October 29, 2012 at 10:05 PM
No release of the dash cam videos and no release of the tortuous interviews of these children...I am so ashamed of our state and country to allow this type of thing to go on...it sickend my heart.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »