.
Feedback

County Lawyer's Letter: Bustamante Investigation Was a Farce

A leaked internal report states the county failed in responding to sexual harassment complaints against the embattled former Orange County Public Works exec and Santa Ana councilman.

A letter from the county counsel to Orange County supervisors -- obtained and released today by a local news organization -- details concerns about how the initial investigation of sexual harassment complaints against former public works executive Carlos Bustamante were handled.

The Voice of OC obtained a letter and an internal report, dated March 2, from Nicholas Chrisos, the county counsel, to the supervisors and posted it on its website.

Howard Sutter, a spokesman for interim Orange County Chief Executive Officer Bob Franz, said he could not release a copy of the letter and could not comment on it.

Orange County Board Chairman John Moorlach was also reluctant to discuss it.

"That's a confidential document, so I had best not comment,'' Moorlach
said.

The letter includes an internal audit report from Peter Hughes, director of the county's Internal Audit Department, that spells out how county officials believe the initial investigation of allegations against Bustamante was botched.

Jess Carbajal, the county's then-Public Works director, received a letter making allegations against Bustamante, a Santa Ana city councilman, in March of last year.

Carbajal was fired in early July, the first casualty of the fallout surrounding the Bustamante case. Carbajal's attorney, Wylie Aitken, did not immediately respond to messages for comment today.

The anonymous writer claimed "the activities that Carlos Bustamante engages in are not only unprofessional but completely inappropriate. To date no one has done anything about him. He is rarely available and it is widely known that if you need him he is either with female employee one (door closed and locked), with female employee two (door closed and locked) which people seem to think is funny that she walks in with her purse and more makeup on when she leaves his office.''

The writer's allegations and the results of an internal investigation into the complaint were not shared with the county's Human Resources Department as required, according to the document from Chrisos.

Second and third letters with more allegations were received in August and October of last year by the Internal Audit Department, and that led to another investigation.

The letters, according to Hughes' memorandum, accused Bustamante and Carbajal of creating a hostile work environment of "sexual harassment, intimidation, retaliation and favoritism.''

Former county CEO Tom Mauk, who resigned after supervisors started reviewing how he handled the complaints, hired an outside law firm to investigate along with the Internal Audit Department last August.

The law firm's report, which was finished by Sept. 29, concluded the allegations against Carbajal could not be supported, but "found ample and credible witnesses to substantiate allegations against Mr. Bustamante of sexually aggressive verbal and physical harassment involving numerous female
county employees,'' according to Hughes' report.

Hughes' report prompted supervisors to ask Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas to investigate, and he filed charges last month against Bustamante, who pleaded not guilty to sexually assaulting seven women when he worked at the county.

The auditor faulted Carbajal for directing his Human Resources manager, Patricia Daniells, to investigate the initial complaints about Bustamante because he was her supervisor.

Moreover, records documenting interviews with employees were not kept and two employees Daniells said she interviewed denied they were approached, according to Hughes' report.

His report to Chrisos, says, "Even giving (Orange County Public Works) the benefit of doubt that an investigation did occur, it was superficial, undocumented, violated EEO policy and was in error regarding the conclusion that, 'Overall the allegations that Mr. Bustamante his (sic) conduct was inappropriate cannot be substantiated.'''

Hughes also wrote: "It's important to note that shortly after (the public works department) finished their investigation, the independent investigator hired by the CEO's office to investigate the August 15th letter of allegations of misconduct found overwhelming evidence of misconduct sufficient for the termination of Mr. Bustamante.''

When confronted with the allegations last October, Bustamante resigned, but publicly proclaimed his innocence. He remains on the Santa Ana City Council.

Hughes advised county officials to close a "gap'' in communication between department heads in such situations. He wants to make it mandatory for departments heads who encounter sexual harassment claims to pass the complaints along to the county counsel and the human resources department.

-- From City News Service

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Clemente Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sicmarc May 9, 2013 at 07:35 pm
Bring back the bowling alley!
Tom Barnes May 9, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Linda, The hypocrisy of opposing subsidies for Spizzirri and the Miramar after you and your companyRead More had the city spend a million on your LAB project is almost laughable. You also accepted an indirect subsidy from the city in the form of parking concessions for the Casino. The irony of big business opposing subsidies for others while accepting them for themselves is long remembered by San Clemente residents. Some consistency would be refreshing.
Lindsey Hanson May 8, 2013 at 03:31 pm
Linda you were 100% okay with such subsidies when they were offered to you. Heck you sued the cityRead More after the residents shut your project down before you could reap the benefits of the millions in subsidies you were set to gain. If you're banking on the residents of San Clemente forgetting your personal and direct involvement in the very same practices you can grantee I'll help remind them. See the thing is I agree with you about giving handouts to folks like YOU and Marc Spizzirri. It's DEAD wrong. The very reason I fought so hard to shut down YOUR PDN. So now that we all remember your involvement in the very same kinds of activities you are protesting we can clearly see why you are upset. You've done such a nice job with the Casino. It IS unfair if they grant subsidies to Mr. Spizzirri after denying you. That in itself is enough reason to be upset and a legitimate reason to protest. But, you cannot deny it is part of your beef with the situation.
CC May 1, 2013 at 11:46 am
Frank Mitchell has the correct FACTUAL not emotional response. Ann D to call yourself a "lovingRead More citizen" and name someone a bigot in the same paragraph shows your true colors. If you truly feel that having non-english speaking children is not a burden on our school system then I suggest you go volunteer in a local elementary school on a weekly basis as I have done then you would be a true "loving citizen"
Ann D May 1, 2013 at 01:58 am
It's just a difference of opinion on where tax dollars should be spent. As a taxpayer I feel myRead More hefty taxes are better served educating children that will grow up into productive adults--"alien" or not they are a hard working people group. We spend far too much on wars and such...spend money on investing in people and guess what I am also fine with the free lunch program. :-) My tax dollars, my vote, money where my heart is. It's fine your heart or passion lies where it does...that's what makes America so great and makes so many people want to come here. Guess what? Your relatives came here too so "alien" status is a little more close to home than you think perhaps.
tiny May 1, 2013 at 12:41 am
Ann D, Williams alien ship may be a u-boat with pariscope up.
lily May 6, 2013 at 06:51 pm
Vikki yes I agree, more bully breed owners should be out there advocating for the breed. ThereRead More are wonderful groups that do just that, but we need more.
PK May 6, 2013 at 05:22 pm
Bottom line is that any animal that is abused or trained to be aggressive by low life owners will beRead More a threat to people and other animals. You cannot blame the animal for how it is treated. It is the owners who brutalize breeds to become this way. I have known some pit bull's that have been treated well, with love and care, and they are the nicest most loyal animals out there. Owners and breeders are responsible.
Vikki Foley Boyd May 6, 2013 at 02:10 pm
Lilly, I think we are saying the same thing. You can't make broad statements about any group.Read More I would never use the word "all" but you can identify 'trends' and draw a correlation between criminals and their choices, i.e., 'generally', drug dealers will own guns. People are ignoramuses if they said to your face that you must be a drug dealer because of your breed. The rescue people think I'm a pretentious highbrow because I will only own a purebred AKC dog. I could care less. They are entitled to their opinion. It's my money and my training time that I put into my dog. Like I said , pitbull owners need to get out there in the dog sports world like Jen. Once the public see's more of these dogs doing amazing work with their responsible handlers, this will show the breed in a more positive light. Instead they sit on chat rooms and complain how they are discriminated against. AKC now allows mixed breed and non-AKC registered dogs to compete in obedience. This is not an expensive sport and can be very rewarding for both dog and handler.
Joanna Clark April 28, 2013 at 01:07 pm
Worth reading . . . http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/04/26-1 Published on Friday, AprilRead More 26, 2013 by Common Dreams San Onofre Whistleblower Cites "Potentially Catastrophic" Design Flaw Inside source tells local news channel that cracked generator pipes at nuclear power plant could cause a full or partial meltdown - Lauren McCauley, staff writer
San Juan April 11, 2013 at 03:20 pm
No, say it aint so, the NUKE causing damage to our enviornment, no, please say it aint so...IT'SRead More SO!!!!!!!!!! SHUT THAT MONSTER DOWN RIGHT NOW AND STOP ALL THE BALONEY. WAKE UP CITIZENS NOW'S THE TIME TO SPEAK UP, IF YOU THINK THE FISH POPULATION IS MESSED UP, JUST WAIT TIL A MAJOR INCIDENT HAPPENS, THEN YOU CAN KISS THIS AREA GOOD BYE, JUST LIKE THE LITTLE FISHIES.!