.
Feedback

A Solution to 3-Story Building Flap?

Rather than a blanket two-story limit in the historical areas of San Clemente, some city officials want zoning that essentially draws a picture for the developer of what to build.

Typically, development regulations, zoning laws and trends in urban planning aren't sexy campaign topics, especially in local elections dominated by everyday issues like pothole repairs and keeping the pool open longer hours.

But not in San Clemente.

Right now, City Council candidates and the public at large are debating whether to ban three story buildings or try costly "form-based" codes that essentially draw builders a picture of what the city wants from them.

As one city staffer said during the divisive Measure A development debate, "Well, they've always said San Clemente is a city of planners."

That has seldom been more clear than during the recent debate over whether to allow three-story additions and developments in the historic areas of North Beach and the Avenida Del Mar/El Camino Real "T-Zone." Opponents of the three-story ban idea ― led by the San Clemente Historical Society in response to a proposed building by Olen next to the old City Hall ― point out that the current zoning has been in place since the 1940s.

Ban opponents want to institute an urban development trend called form-based codes. In Riverside County, Norco uses form-based codes to institute a Western design aesthetic in its Old Towne neighborhood. In Orange County, Fullerton used such codes in planning its 39-acre transit-oriented development downtown in 2010.

At the time, Fullerton Development Director Rob Zur Schmiede said form-based zoning focuses less on land use, setback measurements and density, and more on what the city wants the area to look like.

For example, planners will look at how best to design the streets; what sort of architectural styles best fit the area, given all the historic buildings; how much open space there should be and where to put it; and what kind of benches, lighting and landscaping to use.

"This is cutting-edge urban development," he said in a 2010 interview with the Orange County Register. "We're not the first community to use this, but it's the first time Fullerton has used it."

Because this kind of zoning and code is more concerned with what new buildings look like than what they're used for, one can make general assumptions about the feel and flavor of the area.

In 2010, Fullerton’s senior planner Jay Eastman explained how the code would focus on the streetscape and how buildings interact with other buildings, the environment and landscaping. He said in Fullerton's development, all the buildings will be brick, masonry or stucco. Vinyl siding and shingle roofs won't be allowed.

The zoning codes laid out all the permitted uses in blocks. For instance, west of Pomona Avenue, buildings would contain retail space on the ground floor and residential units above and will be from three to five stories tall. East of Pomona would be primarily housing with some retail fronting Commonwealth Avenue, and buildings will be from three- to six-stories, Eastman said.

According to the Form-Based Codes Institute, annotations to the code include illustrations drawn up by architectural consultants depicting the sort of features the city expects to be incorporated into each building.

One drawback to form-based codes is their high cost to implement. According to the institute, cities have to put out a request for qualifications to find a consultant, who then conducts a lengthy process involving dozens of public meetings and drafts, all of which is expensive.

In recent years, the San Clemente budget's surpluses have been razor-thin, and the state has dissolved its redevelopment agency, which has taken away a huge funding sources. It is unclear as of yet where money for potential form-based zoning would come from.

Where Council Candidates Stand

Council Candidate and incumbent Jim Dahl has expressed interest in the form-based codes approach.

"People's property rights in this community have been abused in the past," Dahl said at a Sunday Historical Society forum. "The concerns are adequately covered in form-based codes."

Candidate Mike Mortenson in a September forum aligned with Dahl in saying he wanted to make three-story development more rigorous, but not ban it outright.

Candidate Bob Baker, however, disagreed: he said Sunday that form-based codes, "allow the government to pick winners and losers."

Candidate Chris Hamm tends to align with Baker on this issue.

"It does not fit with our small town character," he said at the September forum.

Candidate David Clegg has focused more on providing monetary incentives for building owners to improve their properties and maintaining the Spanish-colonial revival architectural style in town.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK IN THE COMMENTS

How should the city regulate development in the heart of the city?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Clemente Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sicmarc May 9, 2013 at 07:35 pm
Bring back the bowling alley!
Tom Barnes May 9, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Linda, The hypocrisy of opposing subsidies for Spizzirri and the Miramar after you and your companyRead More had the city spend a million on your LAB project is almost laughable. You also accepted an indirect subsidy from the city in the form of parking concessions for the Casino. The irony of big business opposing subsidies for others while accepting them for themselves is long remembered by San Clemente residents. Some consistency would be refreshing.
Lindsey Hanson May 8, 2013 at 03:31 pm
Linda you were 100% okay with such subsidies when they were offered to you. Heck you sued the cityRead More after the residents shut your project down before you could reap the benefits of the millions in subsidies you were set to gain. If you're banking on the residents of San Clemente forgetting your personal and direct involvement in the very same practices you can grantee I'll help remind them. See the thing is I agree with you about giving handouts to folks like YOU and Marc Spizzirri. It's DEAD wrong. The very reason I fought so hard to shut down YOUR PDN. So now that we all remember your involvement in the very same kinds of activities you are protesting we can clearly see why you are upset. You've done such a nice job with the Casino. It IS unfair if they grant subsidies to Mr. Spizzirri after denying you. That in itself is enough reason to be upset and a legitimate reason to protest. But, you cannot deny it is part of your beef with the situation.
CC May 1, 2013 at 11:46 am
Frank Mitchell has the correct FACTUAL not emotional response. Ann D to call yourself a "lovingRead More citizen" and name someone a bigot in the same paragraph shows your true colors. If you truly feel that having non-english speaking children is not a burden on our school system then I suggest you go volunteer in a local elementary school on a weekly basis as I have done then you would be a true "loving citizen"
Ann D May 1, 2013 at 01:58 am
It's just a difference of opinion on where tax dollars should be spent. As a taxpayer I feel myRead More hefty taxes are better served educating children that will grow up into productive adults--"alien" or not they are a hard working people group. We spend far too much on wars and such...spend money on investing in people and guess what I am also fine with the free lunch program. :-) My tax dollars, my vote, money where my heart is. It's fine your heart or passion lies where it does...that's what makes America so great and makes so many people want to come here. Guess what? Your relatives came here too so "alien" status is a little more close to home than you think perhaps.
tiny May 1, 2013 at 12:41 am
Ann D, Williams alien ship may be a u-boat with pariscope up.
lily May 6, 2013 at 06:51 pm
Vikki yes I agree, more bully breed owners should be out there advocating for the breed. ThereRead More are wonderful groups that do just that, but we need more.
PK May 6, 2013 at 05:22 pm
Bottom line is that any animal that is abused or trained to be aggressive by low life owners will beRead More a threat to people and other animals. You cannot blame the animal for how it is treated. It is the owners who brutalize breeds to become this way. I have known some pit bull's that have been treated well, with love and care, and they are the nicest most loyal animals out there. Owners and breeders are responsible.
Vikki Foley Boyd May 6, 2013 at 02:10 pm
Lilly, I think we are saying the same thing. You can't make broad statements about any group.Read More I would never use the word "all" but you can identify 'trends' and draw a correlation between criminals and their choices, i.e., 'generally', drug dealers will own guns. People are ignoramuses if they said to your face that you must be a drug dealer because of your breed. The rescue people think I'm a pretentious highbrow because I will only own a purebred AKC dog. I could care less. They are entitled to their opinion. It's my money and my training time that I put into my dog. Like I said , pitbull owners need to get out there in the dog sports world like Jen. Once the public see's more of these dogs doing amazing work with their responsible handlers, this will show the breed in a more positive light. Instead they sit on chat rooms and complain how they are discriminated against. AKC now allows mixed breed and non-AKC registered dogs to compete in obedience. This is not an expensive sport and can be very rewarding for both dog and handler.
Joanna Clark April 28, 2013 at 01:07 pm
Worth reading . . . http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/04/26-1 Published on Friday, AprilRead More 26, 2013 by Common Dreams San Onofre Whistleblower Cites "Potentially Catastrophic" Design Flaw Inside source tells local news channel that cracked generator pipes at nuclear power plant could cause a full or partial meltdown - Lauren McCauley, staff writer
San Juan April 11, 2013 at 03:20 pm
No, say it aint so, the NUKE causing damage to our enviornment, no, please say it aint so...IT'SRead More SO!!!!!!!!!! SHUT THAT MONSTER DOWN RIGHT NOW AND STOP ALL THE BALONEY. WAKE UP CITIZENS NOW'S THE TIME TO SPEAK UP, IF YOU THINK THE FISH POPULATION IS MESSED UP, JUST WAIT TIL A MAJOR INCIDENT HAPPENS, THEN YOU CAN KISS THIS AREA GOOD BYE, JUST LIKE THE LITTLE FISHIES.!