.
Feedback

Wage Freezes, New Overtime Rules, Reworked Contracts Cut Public Safety Costs

In the face of shrinking revenues, Orange County police and fire agencies have cut spending by tens of millions of dollars.

Editor’s Note: This is the last in The county Sheriff’s Department and Orange County Fire Authority are hired by many cities to provide police and fire services. Their contracts are consistently some of the costliest items in local budgets, which are being voted on this month by city officials.

In the face of massive revenue shortfalls caused by the still-sputtering economy, Orange County agencies are looking for ways to save money.

Few departments are exempt, and public safety employees—consistently the most expensive rank-and-file county employees—are also on the chopping block.

There have been several contract re-openers for the unions that organize employees of the Orange County Sheriff’s Department and Orange County Fire Authority, and the new contracts chip away at the generous benefits negotiated in years past.

The new contracts include wage freezes and increases in the portion paid into the beleaguered public retirement system. Other cutbacks include re-jiggering work schedules to reduce overtime and creating a lower tier for new hires that comes with fewer benefits.

Orange County Sheriff's Department Cuts

Last month, the results of a follow-up performance audit of the Sheriff’s Department payroll were presented to the Board of Supervisors.

The board praised Sheriff Sandra Hutchens and the department for cutting overtime by $25.9 million over two years, a 54 percent reduction, according to the county’s performance auditor.

As a result, the department produced the lowest numbers it has seen since before the 2003-04 fiscal year, which was the first year included in a 2008 audit that was critical of the department's overtime spending.

During the 2009-2010 fiscal year, there were 366,931 hours allotted to overtime, totaling $21,643,128. That's down from nearly $48 million in 2007-08.

The department instituted several changes advised in the original audit, which contributed to the steep reduction in overtime.

Such changes included adjusting staffing patterns, implementing a new work schedule and tweaking the labor agreement negotiations. Closing the women's jail led to a huge cost savings. Those inmates were relocated to lockups in other county facilities, said Jane Reyes, Sheriff's Department senior director of administrative services.

"That was a pretty complicated movement of personnel," Reyes said.

As for staffing, the Sheriff's Department was restructured. The changes included reduced funding for 296 positions and a $41-million reduction in salary and employee benefit costs.

Since 2008, the Sheriff’s Department has instituted considerable limitations on what qualifies as overtime. This was largely in response to the original audit's finding that 100 employees had earned more than 50 percent of their base pay in overtime.

The April follow-up audit showed a significant decline. Fifty-three employees of  nearly 4,000 earned from 35 percent to 44 percent of their pay in overtime.

No employee earned more than 44 percent of his or her total wages in overtime.

Since fiscal year 2007-08, the Sheriff's Department has absorbed budget cuts and managed to keep last year’s overtime expenses under budget for the second time in 10 years.

According to the new policy, which was adopted in June 2010, all overtime requests must be approved in advance by a supervisor, and employees may work no more than 48 hours of overtime per 40-hour pay period. Also, there is a policy limit of 16 hours in a 24-hour period.

In addition, the department tweaked its union contracts to mandate "straight overtime," meaning deputies can collect overtime only for hours worked, not when paid vacation and sick hours push them into the overtime threshold, Reyes said.

Fire Authority Cuts

In the face of big budget shortfalls that have been afflicting agencies throughout the state, Orange County fire officials say they are continuing to cut personnel costs.

A provision in recently re-negotiated firefighter contracts states that the general fund must be balanced for pay raises to occur. Union members voted to approve the package, even though analysis showed that pay raises would be unlikely, according to Lori Zeller, assistant chief of business services for the Fire Authority.

The Fire Authority has recently re-negotiated union contracts with the O.C.  Professional Firefighters Association, the O.C. Chief Officers Association and the O.C. Employees Association,  Zeller said.

“We have addressed pensions with these contract negotiations,” Zeller said. “They’ll be paying more toward [their retirement] now.”

New provisions of the firefighters’ contract call for employees to pay toward retirement with a four-year phase-in, up to 9 percent, Zeller said.

A new tier of firefighter will be created for those hired after July 1, 2012—those firefighters won’t be able to retire with full benefits until age 55, five years later than under the current contract.

These changes will save the Orange County Fire Authority about $27 million over four years, Fire Authority spokesman Kris Concepcion said.

A similar contract signed by the Orange County Public Employees Association on May 26 will save the department $1.35 million over  four years, Concepcion said.

That contract includes the phase-up of retirement contributions to 9 percent and creates a lower tier for new employees, which means their retirement benefits will be reduced by more than a third compared with their more senior colleagues, Concepcion said.

-- San Clemente Patch Editor Adam Townsend contributed to this article.

Read the first four parts of this Patch series:


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Clemente Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sicmarc May 9, 2013 at 07:35 pm
Bring back the bowling alley!
Tom Barnes May 9, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Linda, The hypocrisy of opposing subsidies for Spizzirri and the Miramar after you and your companyRead More had the city spend a million on your LAB project is almost laughable. You also accepted an indirect subsidy from the city in the form of parking concessions for the Casino. The irony of big business opposing subsidies for others while accepting them for themselves is long remembered by San Clemente residents. Some consistency would be refreshing.
Lindsey Hanson May 8, 2013 at 03:31 pm
Linda you were 100% okay with such subsidies when they were offered to you. Heck you sued the cityRead More after the residents shut your project down before you could reap the benefits of the millions in subsidies you were set to gain. If you're banking on the residents of San Clemente forgetting your personal and direct involvement in the very same practices you can grantee I'll help remind them. See the thing is I agree with you about giving handouts to folks like YOU and Marc Spizzirri. It's DEAD wrong. The very reason I fought so hard to shut down YOUR PDN. So now that we all remember your involvement in the very same kinds of activities you are protesting we can clearly see why you are upset. You've done such a nice job with the Casino. It IS unfair if they grant subsidies to Mr. Spizzirri after denying you. That in itself is enough reason to be upset and a legitimate reason to protest. But, you cannot deny it is part of your beef with the situation.
CC May 1, 2013 at 11:46 am
Frank Mitchell has the correct FACTUAL not emotional response. Ann D to call yourself a "lovingRead More citizen" and name someone a bigot in the same paragraph shows your true colors. If you truly feel that having non-english speaking children is not a burden on our school system then I suggest you go volunteer in a local elementary school on a weekly basis as I have done then you would be a true "loving citizen"
Ann D May 1, 2013 at 01:58 am
It's just a difference of opinion on where tax dollars should be spent. As a taxpayer I feel myRead More hefty taxes are better served educating children that will grow up into productive adults--"alien" or not they are a hard working people group. We spend far too much on wars and such...spend money on investing in people and guess what I am also fine with the free lunch program. :-) My tax dollars, my vote, money where my heart is. It's fine your heart or passion lies where it does...that's what makes America so great and makes so many people want to come here. Guess what? Your relatives came here too so "alien" status is a little more close to home than you think perhaps.
tiny May 1, 2013 at 12:41 am
Ann D, Williams alien ship may be a u-boat with pariscope up.
lily May 6, 2013 at 06:51 pm
Vikki yes I agree, more bully breed owners should be out there advocating for the breed. ThereRead More are wonderful groups that do just that, but we need more.
PK May 6, 2013 at 05:22 pm
Bottom line is that any animal that is abused or trained to be aggressive by low life owners will beRead More a threat to people and other animals. You cannot blame the animal for how it is treated. It is the owners who brutalize breeds to become this way. I have known some pit bull's that have been treated well, with love and care, and they are the nicest most loyal animals out there. Owners and breeders are responsible.
Vikki Foley Boyd May 6, 2013 at 02:10 pm
Lilly, I think we are saying the same thing. You can't make broad statements about any group.Read More I would never use the word "all" but you can identify 'trends' and draw a correlation between criminals and their choices, i.e., 'generally', drug dealers will own guns. People are ignoramuses if they said to your face that you must be a drug dealer because of your breed. The rescue people think I'm a pretentious highbrow because I will only own a purebred AKC dog. I could care less. They are entitled to their opinion. It's my money and my training time that I put into my dog. Like I said , pitbull owners need to get out there in the dog sports world like Jen. Once the public see's more of these dogs doing amazing work with their responsible handlers, this will show the breed in a more positive light. Instead they sit on chat rooms and complain how they are discriminated against. AKC now allows mixed breed and non-AKC registered dogs to compete in obedience. This is not an expensive sport and can be very rewarding for both dog and handler.
Victoria Carll May 1, 2013 at 02:32 am
Alex, I am so proud of you! Great job. We love you. Aunt Victoria
Tom Scott April 30, 2013 at 03:37 pm
Best wishes and congratulations, Alex! From Tom Scott and your Camino Real Playhouse friends.