.
Feedback

San Clemente CPUC Meeting Dec. 18 Re: Doubling of Smart Meter Opt-out Fees

SDG&E Customers / CALIF ALERT: Opt-out Fees May Double to $400 a year - Speak Out Against All Opt-out Fees at Local CPUC Meetings in December

SDG&E Customers / CALIF ALERT: Opt-out Fees May Double to $400 a year - Speak Out Against All Opt-out Fees at Local CPUC Meetings in December

This is a red ALERT about local CPUC public participation meetings to be held in December, 2012, concerning smart meter opt-out fees. Reasons for opting out of smart utility meters include health and safety concerns, privacy and security. For an excellent, very graphic electronic brochure on smart meter problems and the opt-out, click here.

We encourage San Diego Gas & Electric  and SoCal Gas customers in San Diego and Orange Counties to attend the meeting in San Clemente, on Dec. 18th, from 6-8 PM, at the San Clemente Community Center – Ole Hanson Fireside Room, 100 N. Calle Seville, San Clemente, CA 92672 to speak out against all smart meter opt-out fees, which may soon double to over $400 per year for SDG&E, SCE, and So CA Gas customers. If you live elsewhere in CA, go to the nearest meeting. Bring as many people as possible to these meetings, if you can attend, as your presence does matter and is counted, and can impact CPUC decisions made after meetings are held.

It is noteworthy that the state of Vermont legislated a free smart meter opt-out, statewide, for all utility customers, this year. The system is working well, according to our reports. We feel that there should be no fees and that these are, in fact, illegal, breaking numerous state and federal discrimination laws and California public utility codes. Click Opening Briefs on Discrimination Laws & Opt-out Fees at CPUC (7/20/2012) for more info. 

In Northern and Central California, 57 municipalities have banned or criminalized the installation of smart meters, sending a strong message to the CPUC and state government. This, along with the participation of numerous organizations in CPUC proceedings, produced the opt-out order by CPUC. Those municipalities realized they don't want to have their citizens sickened and be left holding the bag for the costs. Pressure on the CPUC is a good thing and going to meetings does add up to that. Many utility customers know that we are dealing with a badly broken regulatory system, however, saying nothing is condoning it. If you care about your own health or the health of your children and loved ones, you will opt-out AND attend one of these meetings!

If you can't attend, we ask that you write or call the CPUC:

Public Advisor’s Office
505 Van Ness Avenue, Room 2103
San Francisco, CA 94104
E-mail to public.advisor@cpuc.ca.gov

1-415-703-2074 or toll free 1-866-849-8390
TTY 1-415-703-52892 or toll free 1-866-836-7825

--------------------------------------

CPUC Sets Public Participation Hearings on Smart Meter Opt-Out Costs

The CPUC has set five Public Participation Hearings to hear from consumers about costs and cost allocation issues associated with requiring Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Edison (SCE), and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) to offer an analog opt-out option for residential customers who do not wish to have a wireless Smart Meter installed at their location. Each Public Participation Hearing will run for two hours at the following locations:

BAKERSFIELD (PG&E and SoCalGas territories)
December 13, 2012, 6 p.m.
Bakersfield City Hall Council Chambers
1501 Truxtun Ave., Bakersfield, CA 93301

SANTA BARBARA (PG&E, SCE, and SoCalGas territories)
December 14, 2012, 3 p.m.
County Administration Building Board Hearing Room, 4th Floor
105 East Anapamu St., Santa Barbara, CA 93101

LOS ANGELES (SCE and SoCalGas territories)
December 17, 2012, at 6 p.m.
Junipero Serra State Office Building
Carmel Room – Auditorium, 1st Floor
320 West 4th St., Los Angeles, CA 90013

SAN CLEMENTE (SCE, SoCalGas, and SDG&E territories)
December 18, 2012, 6 p.m.
San Clemente Community Center – Ole Hanson Fireside Room
100 N. Calle Seville, San Clemente, CA 92672

SANTA ROSA (PG&E territory)
December 20 2012, at 2 p.m.
Steel Lane Community Center – Dohn Room
415 Steele Ln., Santa Rosa, CA 95403
--------------------------------------------------------
Center for Electrosmog Prevention (CEP) , a La Mesa-based nonprofit, continues to support consumer interests in the CPUC smart meter opt-out and smart grid proceedings. We are advocating for a free and expanded opt-out, disability and medical condition rights and accommodations, and banning of all smart meters. To learn more about our positions and for talking points, go to

Brief filed by Center for Electrosmog Prevention on 07/05/2012

http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/EFILE/BRIEF/170230.pdf
—————————————————————
Brief filed by Southern Californians For Wired Solutions For Smart Meters (SCWSSM) on 07/19/2012

http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/EFILE/BRIEF/171335.PDF (282 kb)
--------------------------------------------------------------
to learn more about the above meetings and opt-out fee issues, go to:
http://www.electrosmogprevention.org/stop-ca-smart-meter-news/2393/

ACTIONS YOU CAN TAKE TODAY:

1. Share this blog article widely.

2. Join or start a local group to work on reducing electrosmog - to inquire about joining a San Diego or Orange County group, contact director@electrosmogprevention.org.

 
With very best regards,
Susan Brinchman
Director, Center for Electrosmog Prevention
P.O. Box 655
La Mesa, CA
91944
director@electrosmogprevention.org
Center for Electrosmog Prevention www.electrosmogprevention.org
Smart Meter Dangers
SCASM Southern Californians Against Smart Meters http://www.causes.com/causes/610453-southern-californians-against-smart-meters-scasm
American Coalition Against Smart Meters (ACASM) www.causes.com/acasm

Follow Smart Meter News and CEP on Twitter http://twitter.com/No2SmartMeters

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Clemente Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sicmarc May 9, 2013 at 07:35 pm
Bring back the bowling alley!
Tom Barnes May 9, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Linda, The hypocrisy of opposing subsidies for Spizzirri and the Miramar after you and your companyRead More had the city spend a million on your LAB project is almost laughable. You also accepted an indirect subsidy from the city in the form of parking concessions for the Casino. The irony of big business opposing subsidies for others while accepting them for themselves is long remembered by San Clemente residents. Some consistency would be refreshing.
Lindsey Hanson May 8, 2013 at 03:31 pm
Linda you were 100% okay with such subsidies when they were offered to you. Heck you sued the cityRead More after the residents shut your project down before you could reap the benefits of the millions in subsidies you were set to gain. If you're banking on the residents of San Clemente forgetting your personal and direct involvement in the very same practices you can grantee I'll help remind them. See the thing is I agree with you about giving handouts to folks like YOU and Marc Spizzirri. It's DEAD wrong. The very reason I fought so hard to shut down YOUR PDN. So now that we all remember your involvement in the very same kinds of activities you are protesting we can clearly see why you are upset. You've done such a nice job with the Casino. It IS unfair if they grant subsidies to Mr. Spizzirri after denying you. That in itself is enough reason to be upset and a legitimate reason to protest. But, you cannot deny it is part of your beef with the situation.
CC May 1, 2013 at 11:46 am
Frank Mitchell has the correct FACTUAL not emotional response. Ann D to call yourself a "lovingRead More citizen" and name someone a bigot in the same paragraph shows your true colors. If you truly feel that having non-english speaking children is not a burden on our school system then I suggest you go volunteer in a local elementary school on a weekly basis as I have done then you would be a true "loving citizen"
Ann D May 1, 2013 at 01:58 am
It's just a difference of opinion on where tax dollars should be spent. As a taxpayer I feel myRead More hefty taxes are better served educating children that will grow up into productive adults--"alien" or not they are a hard working people group. We spend far too much on wars and such...spend money on investing in people and guess what I am also fine with the free lunch program. :-) My tax dollars, my vote, money where my heart is. It's fine your heart or passion lies where it does...that's what makes America so great and makes so many people want to come here. Guess what? Your relatives came here too so "alien" status is a little more close to home than you think perhaps.
tiny May 1, 2013 at 12:41 am
Ann D, Williams alien ship may be a u-boat with pariscope up.
lily May 6, 2013 at 06:51 pm
Vikki yes I agree, more bully breed owners should be out there advocating for the breed. ThereRead More are wonderful groups that do just that, but we need more.
PK May 6, 2013 at 05:22 pm
Bottom line is that any animal that is abused or trained to be aggressive by low life owners will beRead More a threat to people and other animals. You cannot blame the animal for how it is treated. It is the owners who brutalize breeds to become this way. I have known some pit bull's that have been treated well, with love and care, and they are the nicest most loyal animals out there. Owners and breeders are responsible.
Vikki Foley Boyd May 6, 2013 at 02:10 pm
Lilly, I think we are saying the same thing. You can't make broad statements about any group.Read More I would never use the word "all" but you can identify 'trends' and draw a correlation between criminals and their choices, i.e., 'generally', drug dealers will own guns. People are ignoramuses if they said to your face that you must be a drug dealer because of your breed. The rescue people think I'm a pretentious highbrow because I will only own a purebred AKC dog. I could care less. They are entitled to their opinion. It's my money and my training time that I put into my dog. Like I said , pitbull owners need to get out there in the dog sports world like Jen. Once the public see's more of these dogs doing amazing work with their responsible handlers, this will show the breed in a more positive light. Instead they sit on chat rooms and complain how they are discriminated against. AKC now allows mixed breed and non-AKC registered dogs to compete in obedience. This is not an expensive sport and can be very rewarding for both dog and handler.
Victoria Carll May 1, 2013 at 02:32 am
Alex, I am so proud of you! Great job. We love you. Aunt Victoria
Tom Scott April 30, 2013 at 03:37 pm
Best wishes and congratulations, Alex! From Tom Scott and your Camino Real Playhouse friends.