.
Feedback

Rules of the Road for Facebook Politics

Is it OK to talk about politics on Facebook? What about religion? What is the proper etiquette in this new world of social media?

A Facebook friend recently posted: “I won't ever post political or religious statements on any media. Call me chicken, but I just think it isn't anyone’s business.” 

Judging from the number of “Likes” the post received, this seems to be a popular opinion among many Facebook users.  

I’ve been fascinated with the issue of ” since I began using Facebook shortly after the 2008 election. During that election cycle, my communication with friends and family related to the election was limited to forwarding an occasional political cartoon or Op-Ed piece. But the advent of Facebook and other social media outlets has launched a variety of communication options for those inclined to want to share or debate political issues. 

As someone who has become more politically engaged and informed as I’ve become older, I welcome the platform to share information and opinions and, yes sometimes, arguments about the issues that are important to me. Over the past four years, I have weighed in on issues including marriage equality, affordable healthcare, separation of church and state, women’s reproductive rights and presidential elections. If you are a Facebook “friend,” you know my thoughts about people ranging from Michelle Bachman to Anderson Cooper to Barack Obama (loathe, love and support in that order.)

The issue I wrestle with is whether my Facebook friend who prefers to keep her opinions private about hot button issues like religion and politics has the right idea, or whether her friend who responded by saying: “I don't agree and that is how ‘we the people’ have lost control of ‘our’ country - silence means approval,” is correct.

At the risk of sounding too self-important, I tend to fall into the “bad things happen when good people do nothing” camp and, as a result, am one of those people who will post opinions about political and religious issues on Facebook.

I have always been an avid news follower and often feel very passionate about current events. Every morning I compose letters to the editor in my head while drinking my coffee and reading the morning paper. Some even get written and published. However, social media provides a much more democratic, accessible platform for sharing political conversations than traditional media ever did. 

But the rules of engagement are murky. We may feel a false sense of anonymity and safety sharing provocative thoughts from a keyboard rather than in a face-to-face gathering. And it’s true that posts can meet with disapproval and disagreement from friends and family (personally, I’d rather you tactfully disagree with me and foster a discussion of issues rather than silently fume about an opinion that differs from your own.) I believe if you’re going to enter the virtual town square with your opinions, you better have the backbone to endure the pushback you may receive.

I’ve seen some who post very controversial comments but are deeply offended when anyone challenges their point of view.  

My personal rules for engagement are:

  1. I try to always post things I’ve verified as factual. It is simple enough to look things up on a non-partisan site such as FactCheck.org before posting. I will not re-post a headline I read or an inflammatory email someone has forwarded to me about Romney’s “latest gaffe” or Obama’s latest “tax scheme” without first doing my homework.
  2. I try to share things that are informative while adding a few words about how I feel about the story I am sharing.
  3. I try to avoid going off on tangents in a debate and try to stay on original topic. It’s astonishing how many posts begin about something like and end up in a discussion about whether Obama was born in Kenya or Hawaii.
  4.  I try not to get too snarky - I admit it, this can be a tough one for me.

Where the e-etiquette gets even trickier is whether and how to respond to comments from people you don’t even know. I’ve seen discussions started by a friend who then receives replies from other friends who I may not know. If one of their friends says something I really agree with, what’s an appropriate response? A “Like”? A comment voicing support for the post? And trickier yet, what about when the friend of a friend says something I radically disagree with?

Is it appropriate to enter into a debate with a stranger who may have a very close personal relationship with our mutual friend?

I’m not sure that there are any right or wrong answers to this question, and everyone has to decide for themselves what they are comfortable sharing and what they prefer to keep private.

Personally, I view my Facebook wall as my own piece of real estate and feel it is my place to express who I am. I also believe it is a powerful way to network, inform and organize. I figure about 25 percent will agree with me, 25 percent will disagree and 50 percent are apolitical and open to information from those they trust. According to a recent Pew Research study, Facebook users are 78 percent more likely to influence their friends to vote. In my mind, sharing opinions and important news stories to fellow Facebook friends is far more productive than yelling at the TV set at night while watching the evening news. 

Regardless of the proper “dos and don’ts” on the information superhighway, it’s a topic that is here with us to stay as social media will only become a greater part of our interactions in the years to come. I realize the risk I run by publicizing what more pleasant society might say is private business. I sincerely hope I don’t offend anyone and hope to never alienate friends or family members. 

I even promise from time to time to limit myself to innocuous posts about my kids or pets. But then I read a story about babies born into poverty in the Philippines because the Catholic Church has prevented the use of birth control in that country. Or I read about a teenager who commits suicide because he is bullied for being gay. Or I see a story about a family who has lost their home because of catastrophic medical bills and no insurance due to a pre-existing medical condition.  

And I hear in my head, “bad things happen when good people do nothing” and before I know it, I’ve clicked the “update status” button once again and begun tapping away on my keyboard.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Clemente Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sicmarc May 9, 2013 at 07:35 pm
Bring back the bowling alley!
Tom Barnes May 9, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Linda, The hypocrisy of opposing subsidies for Spizzirri and the Miramar after you and your companyRead More had the city spend a million on your LAB project is almost laughable. You also accepted an indirect subsidy from the city in the form of parking concessions for the Casino. The irony of big business opposing subsidies for others while accepting them for themselves is long remembered by San Clemente residents. Some consistency would be refreshing.
Lindsey Hanson May 8, 2013 at 03:31 pm
Linda you were 100% okay with such subsidies when they were offered to you. Heck you sued the cityRead More after the residents shut your project down before you could reap the benefits of the millions in subsidies you were set to gain. If you're banking on the residents of San Clemente forgetting your personal and direct involvement in the very same practices you can grantee I'll help remind them. See the thing is I agree with you about giving handouts to folks like YOU and Marc Spizzirri. It's DEAD wrong. The very reason I fought so hard to shut down YOUR PDN. So now that we all remember your involvement in the very same kinds of activities you are protesting we can clearly see why you are upset. You've done such a nice job with the Casino. It IS unfair if they grant subsidies to Mr. Spizzirri after denying you. That in itself is enough reason to be upset and a legitimate reason to protest. But, you cannot deny it is part of your beef with the situation.
CC May 1, 2013 at 11:46 am
Frank Mitchell has the correct FACTUAL not emotional response. Ann D to call yourself a "lovingRead More citizen" and name someone a bigot in the same paragraph shows your true colors. If you truly feel that having non-english speaking children is not a burden on our school system then I suggest you go volunteer in a local elementary school on a weekly basis as I have done then you would be a true "loving citizen"
Ann D May 1, 2013 at 01:58 am
It's just a difference of opinion on where tax dollars should be spent. As a taxpayer I feel myRead More hefty taxes are better served educating children that will grow up into productive adults--"alien" or not they are a hard working people group. We spend far too much on wars and such...spend money on investing in people and guess what I am also fine with the free lunch program. :-) My tax dollars, my vote, money where my heart is. It's fine your heart or passion lies where it does...that's what makes America so great and makes so many people want to come here. Guess what? Your relatives came here too so "alien" status is a little more close to home than you think perhaps.
tiny May 1, 2013 at 12:41 am
Ann D, Williams alien ship may be a u-boat with pariscope up.
lily May 6, 2013 at 06:51 pm
Vikki yes I agree, more bully breed owners should be out there advocating for the breed. ThereRead More are wonderful groups that do just that, but we need more.
PK May 6, 2013 at 05:22 pm
Bottom line is that any animal that is abused or trained to be aggressive by low life owners will beRead More a threat to people and other animals. You cannot blame the animal for how it is treated. It is the owners who brutalize breeds to become this way. I have known some pit bull's that have been treated well, with love and care, and they are the nicest most loyal animals out there. Owners and breeders are responsible.
Vikki Foley Boyd May 6, 2013 at 02:10 pm
Lilly, I think we are saying the same thing. You can't make broad statements about any group.Read More I would never use the word "all" but you can identify 'trends' and draw a correlation between criminals and their choices, i.e., 'generally', drug dealers will own guns. People are ignoramuses if they said to your face that you must be a drug dealer because of your breed. The rescue people think I'm a pretentious highbrow because I will only own a purebred AKC dog. I could care less. They are entitled to their opinion. It's my money and my training time that I put into my dog. Like I said , pitbull owners need to get out there in the dog sports world like Jen. Once the public see's more of these dogs doing amazing work with their responsible handlers, this will show the breed in a more positive light. Instead they sit on chat rooms and complain how they are discriminated against. AKC now allows mixed breed and non-AKC registered dogs to compete in obedience. This is not an expensive sport and can be very rewarding for both dog and handler.
Joanna Clark April 28, 2013 at 01:07 pm
Worth reading . . . http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/04/26-1 Published on Friday, AprilRead More 26, 2013 by Common Dreams San Onofre Whistleblower Cites "Potentially Catastrophic" Design Flaw Inside source tells local news channel that cracked generator pipes at nuclear power plant could cause a full or partial meltdown - Lauren McCauley, staff writer
San Juan April 11, 2013 at 03:20 pm
No, say it aint so, the NUKE causing damage to our enviornment, no, please say it aint so...IT'SRead More SO!!!!!!!!!! SHUT THAT MONSTER DOWN RIGHT NOW AND STOP ALL THE BALONEY. WAKE UP CITIZENS NOW'S THE TIME TO SPEAK UP, IF YOU THINK THE FISH POPULATION IS MESSED UP, JUST WAIT TIL A MAJOR INCIDENT HAPPENS, THEN YOU CAN KISS THIS AREA GOOD BYE, JUST LIKE THE LITTLE FISHIES.!